Thursday, January 7, 2010

Dating: The 90 Day Rule

I mainly operate in two gears: slow and really fast. There really isn't an in between, which in dating, is not in the least bit desirable to potential dates. I recall last year when I was getting frustrated with the guy who let his friend grope me on Valentine's Day, asking a guy friend for advice on what to do with how I was feeling, now 2 months into dating this guy. Despite the fact that suspicions that he still was not over his ex were beginning to arise, I did really like him.

My friend explained to me that the beginning of any potential relationship should follow a 90 day rule. Sort of like a 90 day probationary period at a new job--it is the time when you are getting to know each other, to see if they'll screw up (and how they handle that) and as you approach 90 days, to decide if that person is worth potentially keeping around for the long term.

It made sense. A trial period, so to speak.

I remember two weeks shy of 90 days jokingly telling the guy that he better shape up or he would be done with come the 90 day point. I was only half kidding because, although I liked him, I wasn't sure he was still worth the time I was investing in the relationship. Sure enough, though, the relationship ended a few days before the end of his probationary period. I just couldn't do it anymore.

Every guy I have dated since then I have gone in with the full intention of trying to give them at least 90 days. Well except for the guy who was the worst date ever, but that goes without saying. And while putting a time limit on a relationship from the get go may seem self sabotaging, I try to look at it from the angle of realizing I am helping myself not to waste my time on relationships that just aren't working, rather than dragging it out and torturing myself.

Do you follow a similar concept? I'd love to hear it.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

11 comments:

Loverville said...

Absolutely -- except that, these days my new relationships seem to taper off after just one month. I guess I'm on fast-forward.

Dating Diva said...

Loverville: Fast forward because you fall fast? That is my problem. Except that I can maintain gung ho for years and years and years, meanwhile, if a guy falls fast, it is usually only for a few months.

Aion said...

I don't put a limit.. however IF their is "chemestry" and we've been dating more than a few weeks I can usually tell by the way she treats her friends, family, children etc.. THAT'S when I see her TRUE NATURE and THEN I know if it'll work out or not. People put up a "facade" when their in the "romance" stage and then when you see them around family BOOM it's GONE! lol That's when it's either ON like Donkey Kong or OFF like Bud Lite for ME!!

That's MY 2cents worth :)

Aion

Dating Diva said...

You are right Aion. I totally look at how a guy treats the females in his family as an indicator of how he will treat me. But most times, meeting the family doesn't come prior to 90 days, so I have to go off of instinct.

thomas said...

I actually have not done that myself however I do recall my friend suggesting I wait 3 months before making any conclusions about who I was dating.

I do have to admit, that at times of loneliness and desperation, we jump into things really fast and scare of the other person. I know I have done this a few times.

Plentymorefishoutofwater said...

Three dates, max. Usually by that point I've found out if they have depression, arthritis, a large vagina or text issues.
http://plentymorefishoutofwater.blogspot.com/

Lifebeginsat30ty said...

I'm with Fishy: 90 days seems like a rather long time! I'm assuming this is after the first initial dates of deciding if you want to even see them again. 90 days for long-term relationship material. I'll let you know when I get past date 3, ha!

RawknRobynsGoneBlogWild said...

Yes, I'm more on the same page as PMF and Life. 90 days is practically a long-term relationship for me. That's pure hell if you don't like the person.
Robyn

Michelle said...

I read this article the other day, which I found really interesting. Not that it pertains exactly to you, but it does fall within the realm of internet dating. It's about two older divorced women and self discovery through craigslist.

http://www.eastbayexpress.com/eastbay/sleeping-around-craigslist/Content?oid=1090348

As for the 90 day rule? I don't like rules, period. It just adds all kinds of unneeded insecurities. I say if you like someone, you like them. You'll be evaluating them along the way with the 90 day rule or not.

Kate said...

I agree with the others in that 90 days seems like a very long time if you're not sure about the other person. I'd say three or four dates usually helps me decide if I want to keep on seeing them. Or one date if they turn out to be a total weirdo!

http://search-for-the-perfect10.blogspot.com

Dating Diva said...

Hmm, Ok I will have to rethink this "rule," Maybe a 4-date rule is better.

Post a Comment

Posting a comment only validates my awesomeness. Thanks for the contribution to my big ego. ;)